![]() |
||
|
B2B Insights Blog
B2B Insights Blog
B2B Insights
Blog Basics Most Recent Postings
Comments
We reserve the right to remove any comments which are
obscene, offensive or otherwise deemed inappropriate for this site. Please see
our Guidelines for more information.
Post Comment March 17, 2009 | 2:46pm
Todd Walter
writes:
Thanks for the feedback. My posting was not intended to pit advertising vs. PR. In fact, we have dozens of postings on this blog advocating marketing programs that balance advertising and public relations.
Rather, I was emphasizing the value of PR as clients go into the budget-cutting mode. I agree that magazines are becoming leaner in space. True, if advertising goes away, the magazine shrinks and the opportunity for PR placements drop. However, in point #3 above, I can't ignore the changing way in which readers get their news - directly from a company and each other. While I'm still a big fan of print magazines (yes, I admit I like to flip the pages by hand), social media is changing that paradigm. My point was that good PR content that provides useful information without marketing fluff is still a high-value offering that can be used to reach the public directly. March 12, 2009 | 6:06pm
Ad Sales Manager
writes:
While I appreciate your comments on maintaining a PR budget, they leave us in the media business quite cold. If advertisers don't support our efforts with paid advertising, we'll simply dry up and go away, leaving no place to host your PR messages. Fewer ad pages mean fewer editors to field PR pitches and fewer editorial pages within which to include PR information. Please try to convince your clients that they should not just use media as free outlets for PR.
March 12, 2009 | 5:56pm
A chief editor
writes:
This is good advice from a PR-provider point of view, but there are some limitations.
B2B magazines are experiencing a flood of PR nowadays, and they can't use as much of it as your column seems to infer. As busy as editors are, magazines are leaner, so there's not as much space to fill. And there's a lot of competition for that "free" PR space. Even for Websites and newsletters, over-use of PR sources for content will turn away readers (especially for technical publications). To be blunt, the "PR Parasites" as we call them -- companies that rely completely on PR or nearly so, can become defacto blacklisted by editors. While editors with integrity are not providing quid-pro-quo (editorial placements in connection with ads), if there's a space to be filled and the choice is between an advertiser that supports the magazine vs. one that relies on PR, then chances are good the advertiser will get the spot. It's better to balance media programs with advertising and PR. Thsi might mean using more electronic placements, such as for newsletters, and Website ads. While not as glamorous, it will maintain a healthier relationship with the publications. Contributors
Categories
|
||
![]() |
|||
| RSS | Client Extranets | Site Map | Terms & Conditions | Home | © 2009 Godfrey |

